Shanghai Si Peng Technology Co., LTD.
Shanghai Si Peng Technology Co., LTD.
Email Us

Did You Know? There Are over 100,000 Commercial Plastic Formulations in the World Today

Not all ''eco-friendly materials'' are truly safe for your health, and not all ''recyclable plastics'' are actually better for the environment. We firmly believe that consumers have the right to know exactly what they’re exposed to every day.

Dual-Dimensional Assessment and Certification System for Material Health and Environmental Impact

SYNLIFE, in collaboration with the State Key Laboratory at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, has launched a comprehensive grading system designed to assess the health risks and environmental impacts of plastic materials. This system enables comparable and interpretable evaluations of how different materials perform under real-world conditions. It is applicable to all plastic materials worldwide.

Two-Dimensional Framework

We have divided material evaluation into two distinct dimensions, using blue and green five-star ratings to represent the health and environmental impact ratings of plastic materials, respectively. Products manufactured using materials certified under this dual-five-star evaluation system will be authorized to display the certification label on their surfaces.


Human Safety

This dimension focuses on the potential impact of materials on human health in real-world usage scenarios. The evaluation emphasizes not whether a risk has already occurred, but whether there are foreseeable uncertainties.


Environmental Impact

This dimension examines the long-term burden and external impacts on the environment throughout the material’s entire lifecycle—from resource extraction and use to end-of-life disposal.


Dual-Dimensional Assessment and Certification System for Material Health and Environmental Impact

Health-Friendly Rating | Assessment Framework

The material health rating comprehensively evaluates the following four aspects:

Raw Material Sourcing and Composition Certainty
  • Distinction Between Virgin and Recycled Materials

  • Whether the composition is clear and traceable

  • Whether there are any mixed materials or uncontrolled sources


In this aspect, recycled materials typically face stricter evaluation due to the complexity of their composition.

Microplastics and Morphological Risks
  • Whether materials may generate microplastics that can be ingested or inhaled by humans during use, wear, or aging

  • Whether such particles have the potential to persist in the environment or bioaccumulate

  • Whether there are pathways of human health impact that have not yet been fully elucidated


The World Health Organization (WHO) has repeatedly noted that significant scientific uncertainty remains regarding the long-term effects of microplastics on the environment and human health, and that they should be treated with caution as a potential health risk.

Chemical Composition and Known Risks
  • Does it contain chemicals that are subject to specific regulations or are of high concern

  • Does it comply with major international regulations and the requirements of its intended use

  • Are there any controversial risks, such as endocrine disruption or chronic toxicity

Migration, Exposure, and Long-Term Uncertainty
  • Stability of Materials During Use

  • Identifying Risks Associated with Chemical Changes Under the Influence of Heat, Light, Time, and Other Factors

  • Are There Any Toxicological or Aging Risks That Have Not Been Fully Studied

  • Are the Byproducts of Degradation or Post-Use Clearly Identified

Environmental Friendliness Rating | Assessment Framework

The Environmental Friendliness Rating is based on the full life cycle of materials and focuses on the following aspects:

Carbon Source Composition
  • Derived from Renewable Resources

  • Percentage of Bio-based Carbon

  • Dependence on Fossil Resources

Recycling Pathways After Use
  • Recyclability

  • Proportion That Can Be Effectively Sorted and Recycled in Practice

Residual and Microplastic Risks
  • Can it truly be converted into a substance within the natural cycle

  • Or does it merely undergo physical fragmentation


In this context, plastic materials that disintegrate but do not degrade will be subject to stricter evaluation.

Circularity and Systemic Impact
  • Performance degradation following recycling or reuse, and the number of times the material can be recycled and reused

  • The additional energy, resources, and carbon emissions required to recycle the material


In this dimension, materials that contribute to a virtuous cycle will receive higher scores, while those that consume unreasonable amounts of resources merely to delay disposal will face stricter evaluation.

Certification Label | Application Procedures and Usage Guidelines

This certification label is a voluntary material label established and managed by SYNLIFE. It is used to indicate that the materials used in a product have undergone a dual-dimensional assessment of health and environmental impact in accordance with this system. This label is not a government-issued or mandatory certification; its purpose is to promote transparency in material information and to provide the industry with reference assessment methods and communication standards.
I. Eligibility Criteria for the Label

Products that meet the following criteria may apply to use this voluntary label:

  • The primary materials used in the product have undergone a two-dimensional assessment.

  • The assessment results for the materials fall within the grade range permitted for display under the system.

  • The material formulation, source, and usage remain consistent, with no substantial changes.


The material assessment was conducted independently based on established methodologies, and the results were not adjusted based on brand, product category, or market application.

II. Application and Review Process
  • Submit material formulations, sources, and relevant technical documentation

  • Conduct a two-dimensional assessment and confirm the rating in accordance with the system methodology

  • Upon successful assessment, grant authorization to use the label corresponding to the designated rating

III. Guidelines for Label Use
  • Certification labels may be used on products manufactured with materials that have passed the two-dimensional assessment to indicate their material grade information.

  • Applicants must ensure that the primary materials used in labeled products are consistent with the evaluated materials in terms of formulation composition, raw material sources, and key processing conditions.

  • SYNLIFE reserves the right to conduct random sampling and verification of labeled products in circulation; if it is found that the actual materials used do not match the evaluated materials, SYNLIFE has the right to revoke the applicant’s eligibility to use the label and to publicly disclose the relevant circumstances.

  • The label must not be split, rearranged, or altered in terms of proportions or color; it must not be used to imply the product’s overall performance, absolute safety, or environmental outcomes, nor must it be used for endorsement or comparative advertising unrelated to this system.

*Explanation of Ratings and Scope of Responsibility

This rating system is based on currently available regulations, testing methods, and scientific consensus, and is intended to facilitate relative comparisons between materials and promote transparency. The rating results do not replace regulatory compliance requirements, nor do they constitute a guarantee of health or environmental outcomes under specific application conditions.

Switch to SYNLIFE.
Switch to SYNLIFE.
Power Your Products with Bio-Based Materials.
We use cookies to optimise and personalise your experience, but you can choose to opt out of non-essential cookies.
To find out more, read our Privacy Policy
Reject All
Accept All